Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37114135›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Clinicopathological and survival outcomes of 4L lymph node dissection in left lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Leilei Shen, Juntang Guo, Weidong Zhang, Chaoyang Liang, Han Chen, Yang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leilei ShenPostgraduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
Juntang GuoPostgraduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
Weidong ZhangPostgraduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
Chaoyang LiangPostgraduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
Han ChenDepartment of Information, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China.
Yang LiuPostgraduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNChinese People's Liberation Army · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whether 4L lymph node dissection (LND) should be performed remains unclear and controversial. Prior studies have found that station 4L metastasis was not rare and that 4L LND may provide survival benefits. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological and survival outcomes of 4L LND from the perspective of histology. Methods: This retrospective study included 74 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 84 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) between January 2008 and October 2020. All patients underwent pulmonary resection with station 4L LND and were staged as T1-4N0-2M0. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were investigated based on histology. The study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The incidence rate of station 4L metastasis was 17.1% (27/158) in the entire cohort, with 8.1% in the SCC group, and 25.0% in the ADC group. No statistical differences in the 5-year DFS rates (67.1% Conclusion: Station 4L metastasis is not rare in left lung cancer. Patients with ADC have a greater predilection for station 4L metastasis and may benefit more from performing 4L LND.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomalymph node dissectionprognosissquamous cell carcinomastation 4L metastasis

Identifiers

PMID37114135
PMCPMC10126266
OpenAlexW4364369082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.