ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Clinically relevant glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft models to guide drug development and identify molecular signatures.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural and Synthetic Compounds, Swords for Glioblastoma Therapy: From Tumor to Its Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Decoding glioblastoma evolution and heterogeneity through mechanistic modeling: implications for clinical translation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Review
- TRPM7 kinase: a target for multimodal drug development in neurological disorders.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Review
- Limitations of Gliadel Wafers and Strategies for Next-Generation Local Delivery Systems for Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Connexin hemichannel blockade by abEC1.1 disrupts glioblastoma progression, suppresses invasiveness, and reduces hyperexcitability in preclinical models.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Review
- The anti-glypican 1 AT101 antibody as targeting agent to effectively deliver chitosan nanobubbles to glioblastoma cells.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Current landscape and future directions of targeted-alpha-therapy for glioblastoma treatment.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Emerging Insights into the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway and Non-Coding RNA-mediated Drug Resistance in Glioblastoma.Current molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Towards Effective Treatment of Glioblastoma: The Role of Combination Therapies and the Potential of Phytotherapy and Micotherapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Bystander Effects, Pharmacokinetics, and Linker-Payload Stability of EGFR-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugates Losatuxizumab Vedotin and Depatux-M in Glioblastoma Models.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Generation of glioblastoma in mice engrafted with human cytomegalovirus-infected astrocytes.Cancer gene therapy · 2024Article
- Muscarinic receptor drug trihexyphenidyl can alter growth of mesenchymal glioblastomaFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Understanding current experimental models of glioblastoma-brain microenvironment interactions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) heterogeneity, aggressiveness and infiltrative growth drastically limit success of current standard of care drugs and efficacy of various new therapeutic approaches. There is a need for new therapies and models reflecting the complex biology of these tumors to analyze the molecular mechanisms of tumor formation and resistance, as well as to identify new therapeutic targets. We established and screened a panel of 26 patient-derived subcutaneous (s.c.) xenograft (PDX) GBM models on immunodeficient mice, of which 15 were also established as orthotopic models. Sensitivity toward a drug panel, selected for their different modes of action, was determined. Best treatment responses were observed for standard of care temozolomide, irinotecan and bevacizumab. Matching orthotopic models frequently show reduced sensitivity, as the blood-brain barrier limits crossing of the drugs to the GBM. Molecular characterization of 23 PDX identified all of them as IDH-wt (R132) with frequent mutations in EGFR, TP53, FAT1, and within the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Their expression profiles resemble proposed molecular GBM subtypes mesenchymal, proneural and classical, with pronounced clustering for gene sets related to angiogenesis and MAPK signaling. Subsequent gene set enrichment analysis identified hallmark gene sets of hypoxia and mTORC1 signaling as enriched in temozolomide resistant PDX. In models sensitive for mTOR inhibitor everolimus, hypoxia-related gene sets reactive oxygen species pathway and angiogenesis were enriched. Our results highlight how our platform of s.c. GBM PDX can reflect the complex, heterogeneous biology of GBM. Combined with transcriptome analyses, it is a valuable tool in identification of molecular signatures correlating with monitored responses. Available matching orthotopic PDX models can be used to assess the impact of the tumor microenvironment and blood-brain barrier on efficacy. Our GBM PDX panel therefore represents a valuable platform for screening regarding molecular markers and pharmacologically active drugs, as well as optimizing delivery of active drugs to the tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.