Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37114110›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2023

Culturally safe, appropriate, and high-quality breast cancer screening for transgender people: A scoping review.

Imogen Ramsey, Kate Kennedy, Greg Sharplin, Marion Eckert, Micah D J Peters

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of transgender health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Imogen RamseyRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-1572
Kate KennedyRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-3533
Greg SharplinRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-1146
Marion EckertRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-6208
Micah D J PetersRosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-3783
University of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a recognized need for evidence to inform breast cancer screening guidelines and services for transgender people, who face barriers to accessing appropriate and inclusive health care. Aims: This review summarized evidence for breast cancer risk and screening guidelines in transgender individuals, including the potential impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); factors that may influence screening decision-making and behaviors; and considerations for providing culturally safe, high-quality screening services. Methods: A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Searches were performed in Medline, Emcare, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting information on the provision of culturally safe, high-quality breast cancer screening services for transgender people. Results: We identified 57 sources for inclusion: 13 cross-sectional studies, 6 case reports, 2 case series, 28 review or opinion articles, 6 systematic reviews, 1 qualitative study, and 1 book chapter. Evidence on rates of breast cancer screening among transgender people and the association between GAHT and breast cancer risk was inconclusive. Factors negatively associated with cancer screening behaviors included socioeconomic barriers, stigma, and lack of health provider awareness of transgender health issues. Breast cancer screening recommendations varied and were generally based on expert opinion due to the lack of clear evidence. Considerations for providing culturally safe care to transgender people were identified and mapped to the areas of workplace policies and procedures, patient information, clinic environment, professional conduct, communication, and knowledge and competency. Discussion: Screening recommendations for transgender individuals are complicated by the lack of robust epidemiological data and clear understanding of the role GAHT may play in breast cancer pathogenesis. Guidelines have been developed based on expert opinion and are subsequently not uniform or evidence based. Further work is required to clarify and consolidate recommendations.

Indexed as

Breast cancercultural safetypopulation healthpreventionscreeningtransgender

Identifiers

PMID37114110
PMCPMC10128429
OpenAlexW4316020282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.