ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
A silent, giant staghorn calculus managed with open surgery: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A huge staghorn renal stone: Is there still a need for open surgery to protect against further damage to the kidney? A case report.Qatar medical journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staghorn calculus usually fills the pelvis of the kidney, the infundibulum, and most of the calyces. It is a rarity for staghorn stones to be asymptomatic; in addition to that, the calculus discussed in this case report was of a very large size and was removed intact. Open pyelolithotomy, the procedure used, is one that comes with a wide range of complications but can be deemed effective in certain cases. In this scenario, it led to no impediments to normal physiology. Case Presentation: Here the authors report the case of a 45-years-old Nepalese male who presented with a large yet asymptomatic staghorn calculus. It was managed with an open pyelolithotomy, and the patient had no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Discussion: Staghorn stones can be complete or partial and often naturally progress to renal impairment. Thus, an aggressive therapeutic approach is crucial, with careful evaluation of the site and size of the stone, the patient's preference, and the institutional capacity. Ideally, staghorn calculi are completely removed, and it is imperative that the functions of the affected kidney are preserved as far as possible and when applicable. Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy is recommended for the removal of staghorn stones, several clinical, technical, and socioeconomic factors contributed to the use of open pyelolithotomy in the management of the case discussed here. Conclusion: Open pyelolithotomy can prove highly effective in removing large stones intact and in a single setting, the importance of which was accentuated by its unique clinical presentation and pathological anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.