ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Afterhours patient phone calls: a quality improvement study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Can Answer Postoperative Questions About Distal Radius Fractures-But Can Patients Understand the Answers?Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to determine the most common topic of patient phone calls received by on-call orthopedic residents at a single academic institution in order to identify areas of improvement for patient outcome and resident workload and wellbeing. Design: Patient phone calls over 82 shifts were documented from May 2020 to January 2021 by on-call orthopedic residents. The length, nature, and associated attending physician of each call were recorded, as well as whether the call resulted in an emergency department visit. The nature of each phone call was categorized into one of 12 categories. Setting: An urban, tertiary care academic institution in the Midwest, USA. Participants: All orthopedic residents on-call during this period logged the phone calls that they received and related relevant data. Results: Orthopedic surgery residents took an average of 8.6 patient phone calls (average 53.3 total minutes) per shift. The most common reasons for the phone calls were pain, prescription, and pharmacy concerns, which together represented over half of the calls. Twenty-one (4.1%) phone calls resulted in an emergency department visit. Conclusion: Concerns about pain and prescriptions were among the most common reasons for patient phone calls. This information points to opportunities for interventions that could help guide how postoperative pain is discussed with patients, including providing patients with reasonable expectations for pain control, function, and tools for better self-efficacy. This approach could not only enhance patient care but also decrease resident on-call workload and improve resident wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.