Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113787›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

An in vivo evaluation of clear aligners for optimal orthodontic force and movement to determine high-efficacy and periodontal-friendly aligner staging.

Yuru Wang, Jie Chen, Siwen Qin, Xue Han, Lijun Liao, Xiutian Sima, Weihua Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuru WangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie ChenState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Siwen QinState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xue HanState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lijun LiaoSichuan Hospital of Stomatology, Chengdu, China.
Xiutian SimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Weihua GuoState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of aligner displacement on tooth movement and periodontal health to improve the efficiency of aligner treatment and explore the mechanism in vivo. Methods: A two-tooth site was established by a finite element (FE) model to virtually evaluate aligner staging. A randomized controlled experiment was conducted when the tooth sites in beagles were treated with fixed or aligner appliances with different movement and force, and tooth movement and internal structure were recorded during the alignment. After sacrificing five dogs, bone-periodontal ligament (PDL)-tooth specimens were removed and processed to conduct uniaxial compression and tensile tests as well as micro-CT imaging and histological analysis. Results: Three displacements of 0.25, 0.35 and 0.45 mm were obtained from FE analysis and applied in beagles. In general, aligners had poorer performance on movement compared to fixed systems in vivo, but the aligner with a staging of 0.35 mm had the highest accuracy (67.46%) (P < 0.01). Loaded with severe force, fixed sites exhibited tissue damage due to excess force and rapid movement, while aligners showed better safety. The PDL under a 0.35-mm aligner treatment had the highest elastic modulus in the biomechanical test (551.4275 and 1298.305 kPa) (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to fixed appliances, aligners achieve slightly slower movement but better periodontal condition. Aligners with an interval of 0.35 mm have the highest accuracy and best PDL biomechanical and biological capacities, achieving the most effective and safest movement. Even with complexity of oral cavity and lack of evaluation of other factors, these results provide insight into faster displacement as a method to improve the efficacy of aligners.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsClear alignerFinite element analysisOrthodonticsPeriodontium

Identifiers

PMID37113787
PMCPMC10126945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.