ArticleHeliyon2023
Evaluation of alveolar bone morphology of incisors with different sagittal skeletal facial types by cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized controlled trial comparing AI-assisted digital and conventional orthodontics: Superior PAR reduction and occlusal outcomes.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Article
- Periodontal tissue increase induced by simultaneous labial and lingual augmented corticotomy for skeletal Angle Class III malocclusion patients-A preliminary study.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Effects of torque overcorrection on mandibular incisor intrusion using clear aligners in the first premolar non-extraction and extraction conditions: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Camouflage treatment of severe skeletal class III malocclusion with effective torque control in an adolescent combined with forward functional shift and hypodivergent.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Soft and hard tissue changes after compensatory treatment in skeletal class III malocclusion.PloS one · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Safe orthodontic tooth movement should be performed within the alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphology of the alveolar bone of incisors. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included pretreatment cone beam computed tomography of 120 patients with malocclusion. Patients were divided into 4 groups (Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class III) according to the subspinale-nasion-supramental (ANB) angle and occlusal relationship. The sagittal root positions, anterior and posterior root-cortical bone angles (AR-CA and PR-CA), root-crown ratios (RCR) and alveolar bone thickness were evaluated. Results: The sagittal root positions were mainly positioned against the labial cortical plate in the maxillary incisors of the Class II division 2 group and engaged by both the labial and palatal cortical plates in the mandibular incisors of the Class III group. The AR-CA was lower than that in the other groups ( Conclusion: Based on several limitations, this study found that maxillary incisor roots were at risk of penetrating the alveolar bone of Class II division 2 patients, and mandibular incisors may have a relatively small range of safe movement on both the labial and lingual sides of Class III patients during orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.