ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2023
Molecular typing and drug sensitivity profiles of
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Refugees in developing countries have poor access to Tuberculosis (TB) care and control services. The understanding of genetic diversity and drug sensitivity patterns of Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 68 MTB positive cases isolated from presumptive TB refugees from February to August 2021. Data and samples were collected in the refugee camp clinics and both rapid TB Ag detection and region of difference (RD)-9 deletion typing were used to confirm the MTBs. Drug susceptibility test (DST) and molecular typing were done using Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) method and spoligotyping respectively. Results: DST and spoligotyping results were available for all 68 isolates. The isolates were grouped into 25 spoligotype patterns, which consisted of 1-31 isolates with 36.8% strain diversity. The international shared type (SIT)25 was predominant spoligotype pattern consisting of 31 (45.6%) isolates, followed by SIT24 comprising 5 (7.4%) isolates. Further investigation showed that 64.7% (44/68) of the isolates were belonged to CAS1-Delhi family and 75% (51/68) of the isolates were belonged to lineage(L)-3. Multi-drug resistance (MDR)-TB was observed only in one isolate (1.5%) for first-line anti-TB drugs and the highest level of mono-resistance, 5.9% (4/68), was observed for PZA(Pyrazinamide). Mono-resistance was observed in 2.9 % (2/68) and while 97.0% (66/68) of the MTB positive cases were susceptible to the second-line anti-TB drugs. Conclusion: The findings are useful evidence for the TB screening, treatment and control in refugee populations and surrounding communities in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.