Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113673›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Mechanostat parameters estimated from time-lapsed

Francisco C Marques, Daniele Boaretti, Matthias Walle, Ariane C Scheuren, Friederike A Schulte, Ralph Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trabecular bone remodeling in the aging mouse: A micro-multiphysics agent-basedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Mechanostat parameters estimated from time-lapsedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francisco C MarquesInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniele BoarettiInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias WalleInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ariane C ScheurenInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Friederike A SchulteInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ralph MüllerInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical loading is a key factor governing bone adaptation. Both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated its effects on bone tissue, which were also notably predicted in the mechanostat theory. Indeed, existing methods to quantify bone mechanoregulation have successfully associated the frequency of (re)modeling events with local mechanical signals, combining time-lapsed

Indexed as

bone remodelingfrequency dependencyhigh performance computingmechanical loadingmechanoregulationmechanostat theorymicro-finite element analysismouse caudal vertebra

Identifiers

PMID37113673
PMCPMC10126906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.