Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113609›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Sepsis survivors and caregivers perspectives on post-acute rehabilitation and aftercare in the first year after sepsis in Germany.

Sebastian Born, Claudia Matthäus-Krämer, Anna Bichmann, Hannah-Sophia Boltz, Marlene Esch, Luisa Heydt, Stefan Sell, Kathleen Streich, André Scherag, Konrad Reinhart and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Measuring health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors and caregivers: a mapping review and a preliminary conceptual framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian BornInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Claudia Matthäus-KrämerInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Anna BichmannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hannah-Sophia BoltzInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Marlene EschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Luisa HeydtInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Stefan SellInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Kathleen StreichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
André ScheragCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christiane S HartogCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis survivors often suffer from new morbidities. Current rehabilitation therapies are not tailored to their specific needs. The perspective of sepsis survivors and their caregivers on rehabilitation and aftercare is insufficiently understood. We aimed to assess how sepsis survivors in Germany rated the suitability, extent and satisfaction with rehabilitation therapies that they underwent in the year following the acute sepsis episode. Methods: Prospective mixed-methods, multicenter study among a cohort of adult ICU-treated sepsis survivors and their caregivers. Interviews were conducted 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge by telephone and comprised closed as well as open-ended questions. Primary outcomes were the utilization and patient satisfaction with inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation and post-sepsis aftercare in general. Open-ended questions were analyzed according to the principles of content analysis. Results: Foun hundred interviews were performed with 287 patients and/or relatives. At 6 months after sepsis, 85.0% of survivors had applied for and 70.0% had undergone rehabilitation. Among these, 97% received physical therapy, but only a minority reported therapies for specific ailments including pain, weaning from mechanical ventilation, cognitive deficits of fatigue. Survivors were moderately satisfied with the suitability, extent, and overall results of received therapies and perceived deficits in the timeliness, accessibility, and specificity of therapies as well as deficits in the structural support frameworks and patient education. Conclusion: From the perspective of survivors who undergo rehabilitation, therapies should already begin in hospital, be more appropriate for their specific ailments and include better patient and caregiver education. The general aftercare and structural support framework should be improved.

Indexed as

aftercarepost-sepsis-syndromerehabilitationsepsissurvivors

Identifiers

PMID37113609
PMCPMC10126403
OpenAlexW4363672548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.