Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113583›Full record

ReviewJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2023

Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula.

Kotaro Maeda, Norihito Wada, Atsuo Shida

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kotaro MaedaDepartment of Surgery, Medical Corporation Kenikukai Shonan Keiiku Hospital, Fujisawa, Japan.
Norihito WadaDepartment of Surgery, Medical Corporation Kenikukai Shonan Keiiku Hospital, Fujisawa, Japan.
Atsuo ShidaDepartment of Surgery, Medical Corporation Kenikukai Shonan Keiiku Hospital, Fujisawa, Japan.
San-ikukai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a challenging complication with unsatisfactory success and a significant burden for the patients. With insufficient clinical data due to the rare entity, the present state of treatments for RVFs was reviewed especially form the point of factors to determine management, classifications, principle of treatment, conservative and surgical treatments with outcomes. Size, fistula localization and etiology, type of fistula; "simple" or "complex," status of anal sphincter complex and surrounding tissue, presence or absence of inflammation, presence of diverting stoma, previous attempted repair and radiation therapy, patient's condition with co-morbidities, and surgeon's experience are important factors to determine the management of RVF. The inflammation should initially subside in cases with infection. Starting with conservative surgical options and interposing healthy tissue for complex or recurrent fistulas, invasive procedures will be performed if conservative treatment failed. Conservative treatment may be effective in RVFs with minimal symptoms and should be done for small RVFs for a 36 months usual period. Anal sphincter damage might need a repair of sphincter muscles along with RVF repair. Diverting stoma can initially be constructed in patients with severe symptoms and larger RVFs to relief the patient's pain. Simple fistula is usually indicated for local repair. Local repairs to transperineal and transabdominal approaches can be used for complex RVFs. Interposition of healthy, well-vascularized tissue can be required for more complex fistulas and abdominal procedures for high RVFs.

Indexed as

conservative treatmentrectovaginal fistularectovaginal repairsurgerytreatment

Identifiers

PMID37113583
PMCPMC10129357
OpenAlexW4366815932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.