ArticleGlomerular diseases
Ridge Regression for Functional Form Identification of Continuous Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Glomerular Disease.
Article in Glomerular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiling of extracellular vesicles from primary hepatocytes, organoids, and mash patients identifies cell injury-specific signatures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Penalized regression models can be used to identify and rank risk factors for poor quality of life or other outcomes. They often assume linear covariate associations, but the true associations may be nonlinear. There is no standard, automated method for determining optimal functional forms (shapes of relationships) between predictors and the outcome in high-dimensional data settings. Methods: We propose a novel algorithm, ridge regression for functional form identification of continuous predictors (RIPR) that models each continuous covariate with linear, quadratic, quartile, and cubic spline basis components in a ridge regression model to capture potential nonlinear relationships between continuous predictors and outcomes. We used a simulation study to test the performance of RIPR compared to standard and spline ridge regression models. Then, we applied RIPR to identify top predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult global mental and physical health scores using demographic and clinical characteristics among Results: RIPR resulted in better predictive accuracy than the standard and spline ridge regression methods in 56-80% of simulation repetitions under a variety of data characteristics. When applied to PROMIS scores in NEPTUNE, RIPR resulted in the lowest error for predicting physical scores, and the second-lowest error for mental scores. Further, RIPR identified hemoglobin quartiles as an important predictor of physical health that was missed by the other models. Conclusion: The RIPR algorithm can capture nonlinear functional forms of predictors that are missed by standard ridge regression models. The top predictors of PROMIS scores vary greatly across methods. RIPR should be considered alongside other machine learning models in the prediction of patient-reported outcomes and other continuous outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.