Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113474›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2023

Exploring Healthy Retinal Aging with Deep Learning.

Martin J Menten, Robbie Holland, Oliver Leingang, Hrvoje Bogunović, Ahmed M Hagag, Rebecca Kaye, Sophie Riedl, Ghislaine L Traber, Osama N Hassan, Nick Pawlowski and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Martin J MentenBioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Robbie HollandBioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver LeingangLaboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hrvoje BogunovićLaboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ahmed M HagagInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca KayeClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Sophie RiedlLaboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ghislaine L TraberInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Osama N HassanBioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nick PawlowskiBioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ben GlockerBioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lars G FritscheDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Hendrik P N SchollInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sobha SivaprasadInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ursula Schmidt-ErfurthLaboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel RueckertBioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew J LoteryClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To study the individual course of retinal changes caused by healthy aging using deep learning. Design: Retrospective analysis of a large data set of retinal OCT images. Participants: A total of 85 709 adults between the age of 40 and 75 years of whom OCT images were acquired in the scope of the UK Biobank population study. Methods: We created a counterfactual generative adversarial network (GAN), a type of neural network that learns from cross-sectional, retrospective data. It then synthesizes high-resolution counterfactual OCT images and longitudinal time series. These counterfactuals allow visualization and analysis of hypothetical scenarios in which certain characteristics of the imaged subject, such as age or sex, are altered, whereas other attributes, crucially the subject's identity and image acquisition settings, remain fixed. Main Outcome Measures: Using our counterfactual GAN, we investigated subject-specific changes in the retinal layer structure as a function of age and sex. In particular, we measured changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), combined ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), inner nuclear layer to the inner boundary of the retinal pigment epithelium (INL-RPE), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Results: Our counterfactual GAN is able to smoothly visualize the individual course of retinal aging. Across all counterfactual images, the RNFL, GCIPL, INL-RPE, and RPE changed by -0.1 μm ± 0.1 μm, -0.5 μm ± 0.2 μm, -0.2 μm ± 0.1 μm, and 0.1 μm ± 0.1 μm, respectively, per decade of age. These results agree well with previous studies based on the same cohort from the UK Biobank population study. Beyond population-wide average measures, our counterfactual GAN allows us to explore whether the retinal layers of a given eye will increase in thickness, decrease in thickness, or stagnate as a subject ages. Conclusion: This study demonstrates how counterfactual GANs can aid research into retinal aging by generating high-resolution, high-fidelity OCT images, and longitudinal time series. Ultimately, we envision that they will enable clinical experts to derive and explore hypotheses for potential imaging biomarkers for healthy and pathologic aging that can be refined and tested in prospective clinical trials. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Indexed as

AgingBiomarker discoveryDeep learningMachine learningRetina

Identifiers

PMID37113474
PMCPMC10127123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.