ArticleOncology letters2023
Real‑world data indicated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone was associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence in high‑risk breast cancer subgroup patients.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous clinical trials have reported equal effects of tumor control between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with breast cancer (BC). However, this conclusion has not been verified in practice. The present retrospective study evaluated if there were different risk profiles for NAC, AC and their combinative modes on disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with BC using real-world data. All women with primary unilateral Stage I-III BC and first recurrence in 2008-2018 at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were retrospectively identified for enrollment. The four modes of chemotherapy administered for primary BC were classified as 'None', 'NAC only', 'NAC+AC' and 'AC only'. One multivariate Cox model was used to estimate the adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) and P-value. Covariates included age, Easter Cooperative Oncology Group grade, T stage, N stage, pathology, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), BC subtype, number of chemotherapy cycles and other therapies. Amongst 637 patients, who had a mean age of 48.2 years at BC diagnosis and 50.9 years at recurrence, the median DFS by the 'None' (n=27), 'NAC only' (n=47), 'NAC+AC' (n=118) and 'AC only' (n=445) modes were 31.4, 16.6, 22.6 and 28.4 months (P<0.001), respectively. Compared with the 'AC only', adjusted HR (P-value) of the 'None', 'NAC only' and 'NAC+AC' modes on tumor recurrence were 1.182 (0.551), 1.481 (0.037) and 1.102 (0.523), respectively. The adjusted HR of 'NAC only' vs. 'AC only' modes were 1.448 (P=0.157) for locoregional recurrence and 2.675 (P=0.003) for distant recurrence. Stratified analyses further indicated that the 'NAC only' mode was associated with a higher recurrence risk in T3-4, N2-3, LVI-positive, or HER2-negative subgroup patients. In conclusion, NAC alone was associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence in high-risk BC subgroup patients in real-world data. Patient selection of chemotherapy mode was involved in practice but could not fully explain this finding. The 'inadequate' NAC was highly likely to have accounted for this observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.