Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113331›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2023

Synthetic Promoter Screening Using Poplar Mesophyll Protoplast Transformation.

Yongil Yang, Yuanhua Shao, Timothy A Chaffin, Amir H Ahkami, Eduardo Blumwald, C Neal Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yongil YangCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Yuanhua ShaoCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Timothy A ChaffinCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Amir H AhkamiEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA, USA.
Eduardo BlumwaldDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
C Neal StewartCenter for Agricultural Synthetic Biology, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant protoplasts are useful to study both transcriptional regulation and protein subcellular localization in rapid screens. Protoplast transformation can be used in automated platforms for design-build-test cycles of plant promoters, including synthetic promoters. A notable application of protoplasts comes from recent successes in dissecting synthetic promoter activity with poplar mesophyll protoplasts. For this purpose, we constructed plasmids with TurboGFP driven by a synthetic promoter together with TurboRFP constitutively controlled by a 35S promoter, to monitor transformation efficiency, allowing versatile screening of high numbers of cells by monitoring green fluorescent protein expression in transformed protoplasts. Herein, we introduce a protocol for poplar mesophyll protoplast isolation followed by protoplast transformation and image analysis for the selection of valuable synthetic promoters. Graphical overview.

Indexed as

FluorescenceImage analysisMesophyll protoplastsPoplarSynthetic promoter

Identifiers

PMID37113331
PMCPMC10127045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.