Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113307›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Technical Feasibility of Whole-eye Vascular Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review.

Matteo Laspro, Bachar F Chaya, Hilliard T Brydges, Nikhil Dave, Erika Thys, Ogechukwu C Onuh, David Tran, Laura L Kimberly, Daniel J Ceradini, Eduardo D Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Monitoring outcomes of the first human whole eye allotransplant.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matteo LasproHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Bachar F ChayaHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Hilliard T BrydgesHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Nikhil DaveHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Erika ThysHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Ogechukwu C OnuhHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
David TranHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Laura L KimberlyHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Daniel J CeradiniHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
Eduardo D RodriguezHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are over 43 million individuals in the world who are blind. As retinal ganglion cells are incapable of regeneration, treatment modalities for this condition are limited. Since first incepted in 1885, whole-eye transplantation (WET) has been proposed as the ultimate cure for blindness. As the field evolves, different aspects of the surgery have been individually explored, including allograft viability, retinal survival, and optic nerve regeneration. Due to the paucity in the WET literature, we aimed to systematically review proposed WET surgical techniques to assess surgical feasibility. Additionally, we hope to identify barriers to future clinical application and potential ethical concerns that could be raised with surgery. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to June 10, 2022, to identify articles pertaining to WET. Data collection included model organisms studied, surgical techniques utilized, and postoperative functional outcomes. Results: Our results yielded 33 articles, including 14 mammalian and 19 cold-blooded models. In studies performing microvascular anastomosis in mammals, 96% of allografts survived after surgery. With nervous coaptation, 82.9% of retinas had positive electroretinogram signals after surgery, indicating functional retinal cells after transplantation. Results on optic nerve function were inconclusive. Ocular-motor functionality was rarely addressed. Conclusions: Regarding allograft survival, WET appears feasible with no complications to the recipient recorded in previous literature. Functional restoration is potentially achievable with a demonstrated positive retinal survival in live models. Nevertheless, the potential of optic nerve regeneration remains undetermined.

Identifiers

PMID37113307
PMCPMC10129168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.