Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113135›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Synergistic effect and antibiofilm activity of the antimicrobial peptide K11 with conventional antibiotics against multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant

Chawalit Chatupheeraphat, Jiratchaya Peamchai, Sirirat Luk-In, Warawan Eiamphungporn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Computer-Aided Design ofACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of uropathogenicCurrent urology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Phage and endolysin-based inhibition ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Machine learning for predictingBioinformation · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chawalit ChatupheeraphatCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Jiratchaya PeamchaiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sirirat Luk-InDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Warawan EiamphungpornDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Infections caused by drug-resistant Methods: Fifteen clinical isolates of MDR/XDR Results: The MIC values of K11 against MDR/XDR Conclusion: These findings indicate that K11 is a promising candidate with potent antibacterial and antibiofilm activities without inducing resistance and acts synergistically with conventional antibiotics against drug-resistant

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsKlebsiella pneumoniaeAntimicrobial PeptidesBiofilmsChloramphenicolDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRifampinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesChloramphenicolMeropenemRifampinantibiofilmchloramphenicolK11meropenemmultidrug-resistant K. pneumoniaerifampicinsynergy

Identifiers

PMID37113135
PMCPMC10126264
OpenAlexW4364369050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.