Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113060›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2023

Quantification and prospective evaluation of serum NfL and GFAP as blood-derived biomarkers of outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Federica Ferrari, Daniela Rossi, Alessandra Ricciardi, Carlo Morasso, Liliana Brambilla, Sara Albasini, Renzo Vanna, Chiara Fassio, Tatjana Begenisic, Marianna Loi and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Federica FerrariDept of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Daniela RossiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory for Research on Neurodegenerative Disorders, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandra RicciardiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging, Pavia, Italy.
Carlo MorassoIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging, Pavia, Italy.
Liliana BrambillaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory for Research on Neurodegenerative Disorders, Pavia, Italy.
Sara AlbasiniIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging, Pavia, Italy.
Renzo VannaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging, Pavia, Italy.
Chiara FassioIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Department of Neurorehabilitation of Pavia Institute, Italy.
Tatjana BegenisicIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Department of Neurorehabilitation of Pavia Institute, Italy.
Marianna LoiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Department of Neurorehabilitation of Pavia Institute, Italy.
Daniela BossiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Department of Neurorehabilitation of Pavia Institute, Italy.
Alberto ZalianiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Department of Neurorehabilitation of Pavia Institute, Italy.
Elisa AlbericiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neuroradiology Unit, Pavia, Italy.
Claudio LisiUnit of Rehabilitation, Dept of Medical Sciences and Infectious Disease, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea MorottiNeurology Unit, Dept of Neurological Sciences and Vision, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6558-1155
Anna CavalliniEmergency Neurology Unit and Stroke Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Mondino, Pavia, Italy.
Federico MazzacaneDept of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio NardoneDept of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Fabio CorsiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging, Pavia, Italy.
Marta TruffiIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Molecular Imaging, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1095-4188
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITFondazione FADOI · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of reliable and accessible biomarkers to characterize ischemic stroke patients' prognosis remains a clinical challenge. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are markers of brain injury, detectable in blood by high-sensitive technologies. Our aim was to measure serum NfL and GFAP after stroke, and to evaluate their correlation with functional outcome and the scores in rehabilitation scales at 3-month follow-up. Stroke patients were prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal observational study within 24 hours from symptom onset (D1) and monitored after 7 (D7), 30 ± 3 (M1) and 90 ± 5 (M3) days. At each time-point serum NfL and GFAP levels were measured by Single Molecule Array and correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin scale (mRS), Trunk Control Test (TCT), Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Serum NfL and GFAP showed different temporal profiles: NfL increased after stroke with a peak value at D7; GFAP showed an earlier peak at D1. NfL and GFAP concentrations correlated with clinical/rehabilitation outcomes both longitudinally and prospectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that NfL-D7 and GFAP-D1 were independent predictors of 3-month NIHSS, TCT, FAC and FIM scores, with NfL being the biomarker with the best predictive performance.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansIntermediate FilamentsBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinBlood-derived biomarkersGFAPischemic strokeNfLpredictive factors

Identifiers

PMID37113060
PMCPMC10414005
OpenAlexW4367320734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.