ArticleViruses2023
Factors Associated with Disagreement of Fibrosis Stages between 2D-Shear Wave Elastography and Transient Elastography in Chronic Hepatitis B.
Article in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imaging-based fibrosis assessment and risk stratification in MASLD.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesThe agreement of elastography techniques in chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) needs evaluation. We aimed to evaluate, in CHB, the agreement between transient elastography (TE) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), analyzing the factors related to the disagreement of measures. MATERIALS AND
methodsCHB patients underwent liver stiffness measures with both TE and 2D-SWE on the same day. For concordance analysis, we defined liver fibrosis as F0/1 vs. F ≥ 2, F0/1-F2 vs. F ≥ 3 and F0/1-F2-F3 vs. F4 for both methods. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the variables independently associated with the disagreement between methods.
resultsA total of 150 patients were enrolled. Liver fibrosis categorization according to TE was: F0-F1 = 73 (50.4%), F ≥ 2 = 40 (27.6%), F ≥ 3 = 21 (14.5%) and F4 = 11 (7.6%), and according to 2D-SWE was: F0/F1 = 113 (77.9%), F ≥ 2 = 32 (22.1%), F≥ 3 = 25 (17.2%) and F4 = 11 (7.6%). It was observed that 20.0% of the sample had steatosis (CAP≥ 275 dB/m). TE and SD-SWE estimated equal fibrosis stages in 79.3% of cases. Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.71 (
conclusionsIn CHB, there is strong correlation and good agreement between TE and 2D-SWE in identifying fibrosis stages. Diabetes mellitus and antiviral therapy may impact the agreement of stiffness measures obtained with these elastographic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.