Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112700›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives for Rotavirus Vaccines Switch in the World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa.

Inacio Mandomando, Augusto Messa, Joseph Nsiari-Muzeyi Biey, Gilson Paluku, Mutale Mumba, Jason M Mwenda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Enterics for Global Health (EFGH)Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Inacio MandomandoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo P.O. Box 1929, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-1078-2187
Augusto MessaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo P.O. Box 1929, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-1794-2462
Joseph Nsiari-Muzeyi BieyInter Country Support Team (IST) for West Africa, Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organization (WHO), Ouagadougou 03 BP 7019, Burkina Faso.
Gilson PalukuInter Country Support Team (IST) for Central Africa, World Health Organization, Libreville P.O. Box 820, Gabon.
Mutale MumbaInter Country Support Team (IST) for East and Southern Africa, Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organization, Harare P.O. Box 5160, Zimbabwe.
Jason M MwendaRegional Office for Africa, World Health Organization (WHO), Brazzaville P.O. Box 06, Congo.
Manhiça Health Research Centre · MZWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CGWorld Health Organization - Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation, 38/47 countries have introduced rotavirus vaccines into the program of immunization in the WHO Regional Office for Africa (WHO/AFRO). Initially, two vaccines (Rotarix and Rotateq) were recommended and recently two additional vaccines (Rotavac and Rotasiil) have become available. However, the global supply challenges have increasingly forced some countries in Africa to switch vaccine products. Therefore, the recent WHO pre-qualified vaccines (Rotavac, Rotasiil) manufactured in India, offer alternatives and reduce global supply challenges related to rotavirus vaccines; Methods: Using a questionnaire, we administered to the Program Managers, Expanded Program for Immunization, we collected data on vaccine introduction and vaccine switch and the key drivers of the decisions for switching vaccines products, in the WHO/AFRO. Data was also collected fromliterature review and the global new vaccine introduction status data base maintained by WHO and other agencies.

resultsOf the 38 countries that introduced the vaccine, 35 (92%) initially adopted Rotateq or Rotarix; and 23% (8/35) switched between products after rotavirus vaccine introduction to either Rotavac (n = 3), Rotasiil (n = 2) or Rotarix (n = 3). Three countries (Benin, Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria) introduced the rotavirus vaccines manufactured in India. The decision to either introduce or switch to the Indian vaccines was predominately driven by global supply challenges or supply shortage. The withdrawal of Rotateq from the African market, or cost-saving for countries that graduated or in transition from Gavi support was another reason to switch the vaccine; Conclusions: The recently WHO pre-qualified vaccines have offered the countries, opportunities to adopt these cost-effective products, particularly for countries that have graduated or transitioning from full Gavi support, to sustain the demand of vaccines products.

Indexed as

rotavirusswitchvaccineWHO AFR

Identifiers

PMID37112700
PMCPMC10140870
OpenAlexW4362558116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.