Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112691›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

A COVID-19 DNA Vaccine Candidate Elicits Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies against Multiple SARS-CoV-2 Variants including the Currently Circulating Omicron BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1 and XBB.

Yuan Ding, Feng Fan, Xin Xu, Gan Zhao, Xin Zhang, Huiyun Zhao, Limei Wang, Bin Wang, Xiao-Ming Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. DNA-based immunotherapy for cancer: In vivo approaches for recalcitrant targets.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuan DingAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Feng FanAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Xin XuAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Gan ZhaoAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Xin ZhangAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Huiyun ZhaoAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Limei WangAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.
Bin WangAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9945-1818
Xiao-Ming GaoAdvaccine Biopharmaceutics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215123, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waves of breakthrough infections by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants currently pose a global challenge to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We previously reported a pVAX1-based DNA vaccine candidate, pAD1002, that encodes a receptor-binding domain (RBD) chimera of SARS-CoV-1 and Omicron BA.1. In mouse and rabbit models, pAD1002 plasmid induced cross-neutralizing Abs against heterologous sarbecoviruses, including SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 wildtype, Delta and Omicron variants. However, these antisera failed to block the recent emerging Omicron subvariants BF.7 and BQ.1. To solve this problem, we replaced the BA.1 RBD-encoding DNA sequence in pAD1002 with that of BA.4/5. The resulting construct, namely pAD1016, elicited SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IFN-γ

Indexed as

COVID-19DNA vaccineOmicronRBD chimeraSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37112691
PMCPMC10144402
OpenAlexW4362468435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.