Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112678›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a Population-Based Study of Minnesota Residents.

Sallee Brandt, Ryan T Demmer, Sara Walsh, John F Mulcahy, Evelyn Zepeda, Stephanie Yendell, Craig Hedberg, Angela K Ulrich, Timothy Beebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sallee BrandtDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Ryan T DemmerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Sara WalshHealth Sciences, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.
John F MulcahyDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Evelyn ZepedaHealth Sciences, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.
Stephanie YendellMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164, USA.
Craig HedbergDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Angela K UlrichDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Timothy BeebeDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Chicago · USMinnesota Department of Health · US

Funding

Minnesota Department of Health CON000000093412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 continues to be a public health concern in the United States. Although safe and effective vaccines have been developed, a significant proportion of the US population has not received a COVID-19 vaccine. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe the demographics and behaviors of Minnesota adults who have not received the primary series of the COVID-19 vaccine, or the booster shot using data from the Minnesota COVID-19 Antibody Study (MCAS) collected through a population-based sample between September and December 2021. Data were collected using a web-based survey sent to individuals that responded to a similar survey in 2020 and their adult household members. The sample was 51% female and 86% White/Non-Hispanic. A total of 9% of vaccine-eligible participants had not received the primary series and 23% of those eligible to receive a booster had not received it. Older age, higher education, better self-reported health, $75,000 to $100,000 annual household income, mask-wearing, and social distancing were associated with lower odds of hesitancy. Gender, race, and previous COVID-19 infection were not associated with hesitancy. The most frequently reported reason for not receiving a COVID-19 vaccination was safety concerns. Mask-wearing and being age 65 or older were the only strong predictors of lower odds of vaccine hesitancy for both the primary series and booster analyses.

Indexed as

booster vaccineinfectionsinfectious diseasepublic healthpublic health preparednesssurveillancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37112678
PMCPMC10143128
OpenAlexW4361279834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.