Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112507›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Graph Representation Learning and Its Applications: A Survey.

Van Thuy Hoang, Hyeon-Ju Jeon, Eun-Soon You, Yoewon Yoon, Sungyeop Jung, O-Joun Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Van Thuy HoangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, The Catholic University of Korea, 43, Jibong-ro, Bucheon-si 14662, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4094-1123
Hyeon-Ju JeonData Assimilation Group, Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS), 35, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07071, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2400-8360
Eun-Soon YouDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, The Catholic University of Korea, 43, Jibong-ro, Bucheon-si 14662, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Yoewon YoonDepartment of Social Welfare, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6179-974X
Sungyeop JungSemiconductor Devices and Circuits Laboratory, Advanced Institute of Convergence Technology (AICT), Seoul National University, 145, Gwanggyo-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si 16229, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2669-1797
O-Joun LeeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, The Catholic University of Korea, 43, Jibong-ro, Bucheon-si 14662, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8921-5443

Funding

Advanced Institute of Convergence Technology AICT-2022-0015Korea Meteorological Administration KMA2020-02211National Research Foundation of Korea 2022M3F3A2A01076569National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1F1A1065516The Catholic University of Korea M-2022-B0008-00153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphs are data structures that effectively represent relational data in the real world. Graph representation learning is a significant task since it could facilitate various downstream tasks, such as node classification, link prediction, etc. Graph representation learning aims to map graph entities to low-dimensional vectors while preserving graph structure and entity relationships. Over the decades, many models have been proposed for graph representation learning. This paper aims to show a comprehensive picture of graph representation learning models, including traditional and state-of-the-art models on various graphs in different geometric spaces. First, we begin with five types of graph embedding models: graph kernels, matrix factorization models, shallow models, deep-learning models, and non-Euclidean models. In addition, we also discuss graph transformer models and Gaussian embedding models. Second, we present practical applications of graph embedding models, from constructing graphs for specific domains to applying models to solve tasks. Finally, we discuss challenges for existing models and future research directions in detail. As a result, this paper provides a structured overview of the diversity of graph embedding models.

Indexed as

graph embeddinggraph neural networksgraph representation learninggraph transformer

Identifiers

PMID37112507
PMCPMC10144941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.