ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Regularization for Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regularization is an important technique for training deep neural networks. In this paper, we propose a novel shared-weight teacher-student strategy and a content-aware regularization (CAR) module. Based on a tiny, learnable, content-aware mask, CAR is randomly applied to some channels in the convolutional layers during training to be able to guide predictions in a shared-weight teacher-student strategy. CAR prevents motion estimation methods in unsupervised learning from co-adaptation. Extensive experiments on optical flow and scene flow estimation show that our method significantly improves on the performance of the original networks and surpasses other popular regularization methods. The method also surpasses all variants with similar architectures and the supervised PWC-Net on MPI-Sintel and on KITTI. Our method shows strong cross-dataset generalization, i.e., our method solely trained on MPI-Sintel outperforms a similarly trained supervised PWC-Net by 27.9% and 32.9% on KITTI, respectively. Our method uses fewer parameters and less computation, and has faster inference times than the original PWC-Net.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.