Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112349›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Performance Evaluation of Container Orchestration Tools in Edge Computing Environments.

Ivan Čilić, Petar Krivić, Ivana Podnar Žarko, Mario Kušek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivan ČilićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Petar KrivićFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana Podnar ŽarkoFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2142
Mario KušekFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

Croatian Science Foundation IP-2019-04-1986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edge computing is a viable approach to improve service delivery and performance parameters by extending the cloud with resources placed closer to a given service environment. Numerous research papers in the literature have already identified the key benefits of this architectural approach. However, most results are based on simulations performed in closed network environments. This paper aims to analyze the existing implementations of processing environments containing edge resources, taking into account the targeted quality of service (QoS) parameters and the utilized orchestration platforms. Based on this analysis, the most popular edge orchestration platforms are evaluated in terms of their workflow that allows the inclusion of remote devices in the processing environment and their ability to adapt the logic of the scheduling algorithms to improve the targeted QoS attributes. The experimental results compare the performance of the platforms and show the current state of their readiness for edge computing in real network and execution environments. These findings suggest that Kubernetes and its distributions have the potential to provide effective scheduling across the resources on the network's edge. However, some challenges still have to be addressed to completely adapt these tools for such a dynamic and distributed execution environment as edge computing implies.

Indexed as

containeredge computingInternet of Things (IoT)ioFogK3sKubeEdgeKubernetesservice orchestrationservice scheduling

Identifiers

PMID37112349
PMCPMC10143384
OpenAlexW4366220764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.