Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112321›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Experimental Exploration of Multilevel Human Pain Assessment Using Blood Volume Pulse (BVP) Signals.

Muhammad Umar Khan, Sumair Aziz, Niraj Hirachan, Calvin Joseph, Jasper Li, Raul Fernandez-Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Umar KhanHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6992-6432
Sumair AzizHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-0772
Niraj HirachanHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-0460-3077
Calvin JosephHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.
Jasper LiHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.
Raul Fernandez-RojasHuman-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-4241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill patients often lack cognitive or communicative functions, making it challenging to assess their pain levels using self-reporting mechanisms. There is an urgent need for an accurate system that can assess pain levels without relying on patient-reported information. Blood volume pulse (BVP) is a relatively unexplored physiological measure with the potential to assess pain levels. This study aims to develop an accurate pain intensity classification system based on BVP signals through comprehensive experimental analysis. Twenty-two healthy subjects participated in the study, in which we analyzed the classification performance of BVP signals for various pain intensities using time, frequency, and morphological features through fourteen different machine learning classifiers. Three experiments were conducted using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to better examine the hidden signatures of BVP signals for pain level classification. The results of the experiments showed that BVP signals combined with machine learning can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain levels in clinical settings. Specifically, no pain and high pain BVP signals were classified with 96.6% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 91.6% specificity using a combination of time, frequency, and morphological features with artificial neural networks (ANNs). The classification of no pain and low pain BVP signals yielded 83.3% accuracy using a combination of time and morphological features with the AdaBoost classifier. Finally, the multi-class experiment, which classified no pain, low pain, and high pain, achieved 69% overall accuracy using a combination of time and morphological features with ANN. In conclusion, the experimental results suggest that BVP signals combined with machine learning can offer an objective and reliable assessment of pain levels in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Blood VolumeNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHeart RateHumansPainPain Measurementblood volume pulse (BVP)feature extractionmachine learningpain classificationpain intensity classificationPPG

Identifiers

PMID37112321
PMCPMC10143826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.