Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112305›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Designing Ecological Auditory Feedback on Lower Limb Kinematics for Hemiparetic Gait Training.

Prithvi Ravi Kantan, Sofia Dahl, Helle Rovsing Jørgensen, Chetali Khadye, Erika G Spaich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A review of concurrent sonified biofeedback in balance and gait training.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prithvi Ravi KantanDepartment of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5618-4265
Sofia DahlDepartment of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-7810
Helle Rovsing JørgensenNeuroenhed Nord, Regionhospital Nordjylland, 9700 Brønderslev, Denmark.
Chetali KhadyeDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8998-571X
Erika G SpaichDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-4064

Funding

BETA.HEALTH (The Danish National Innovation Platform for 981 Future Healthcare) 2022-1294NordForsk's Nordic University Hub, Nordic Sound and Music Computing Network NordicSMC 86892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory feedback has earlier been explored as a tool to enhance patient awareness of gait kinematics during rehabilitation. In this study, we devised and tested a novel set of concurrent feedback paradigms on swing phase kinematics in hemiparetic gait training. We adopted a user-centered design approach, where kinematic data recorded from 15 hemiparetic patients was used to design three feedback algorithms (wading sounds, abstract, musical) based on filtered gyroscopic data from four inexpensive wireless inertial units. The algorithms were tested (hands-on) by a focus group of five physiotherapists. They recommended that the abstract and musical algorithms be discarded due to sound quality and informational ambiguity. After modifying the wading algorithm (as per their feedback), we conducted a feasibility test involving nine hemiparetic patients and seven physiotherapists, where variants of the algorithm were applied to a conventional overground training session. Most patients found the feedback meaningful, enjoyable to use, natural-sounding, and tolerable for the typical training duration. Three patients exhibited immediate improvements in gait quality when the feedback was applied. However, minor gait asymmetries were found to be difficult to perceive in the feedback, and there was variability in receptiveness and motor change among the patients. We believe that our findings can advance current research in inertial sensor-based auditory feedback for motor learning enhancement during neurorehabilitation.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicNeurological RehabilitationParesisBiomechanical PhenomenaFeedbackGaitHumansLower Extremityacoustic feedbackassistive technologybiofeedbackgaitgait rehabilitationhemipareticswing phase

Identifiers

PMID37112305
PMCPMC10145885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.