Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112211›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Complex of Marine Geophysical Methods for Studying Gas Emission Process on the Arctic Shelf.

Artem A Krylov, Roman A Ananiev, Denis V Chernykh, Dmitry A Alekseev, Ermolay I Balikhin, Nikolay N Dmitrevsky, Mikhail A Novikov, Elena A Radiuk, Anna V Domaniuk, Sergey A Kovachev and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Artem A KrylovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Roman A AnanievShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4486-8974
Denis V ChernykhV.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43, Baltijskaya St., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-7100
Dmitry A AlekseevV.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43, Baltijskaya St., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Ermolay I BalikhinV.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43, Baltijskaya St., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Nikolay N DmitrevskyShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail A NovikovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-5232
Elena A RadiukShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Anna V DomaniukV.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43, Baltijskaya St., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Sergey A KovachevShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Georgy K TimashkevichShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir N IvanovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry A IlinskyShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Oleg Yu GanzhaShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey Yu GunarTomsk State University, 36, Lenina Prospekt, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Pavel Yu PushkarevLomonosov Moscow State University (MSU), 1, Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey V KoshurnikovTomsk State University, 36, Lenina Prospekt, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Leopold I LobkovskyShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Igor P SemiletovV.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43, Baltijskaya St., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation project 'Priority-2030', Tomsk State UniversityRussian President Grant for young scientists МК-45.2022.1.5Russian Science Foundation 21-77-30001Russian State Assignment FMWE-2021-0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Russian sector of the arctic shelf is the longest in the world. Quite a lot of places of massive discharge of bubble methane from the seabed into the water column and further into the atmosphere were found there. This natural phenomenon requires an extensive complex of geological, biological, geophysical, and chemical studies. This article is devoted to aspects of the use of a complex of marine geophysical equipment applied in the Russian sector of the arctic shelf for the detection and study of areas of the water and sedimentary strata with increased saturation with natural gases, as well as a description of some of the results obtained. This complex contains a single-beam scientific high-frequency echo sounder and multibeam system, a sub-bottom profiler, ocean-bottom seismographs, and equipment for continuous seismoacoustic profiling and electrical exploration. The experience of using the above equipment and the examples of the results obtained in the Laptev Sea have shown that these marine geophysical methods are effective and of particular importance for solving most problems related to the detection, mapping, quantification, and monitoring of underwater gas release from the bottom sediments of the shelf zone of the arctic seas, as well as the study of upper and deeper geological roots of gas emission and their relationship with tectonic processes. Geophysical surveys have a significant performance advantage compared to any contact methods. The large-scale application of a wide range of marine geophysical methods is essential for a comprehensive study of the geohazards of vast shelf zones, which have significant potential for economic use.

Indexed as

arctic seascontinuous seismoacoustic profilinggas seepsmarine geophysicsmultibeam sonarocean-bottom seismographssingle-beam echo soundersub-bottom profilertime-domain electromagnetic imaging

Identifiers

PMID37112211
PMCPMC10142650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.