ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Enhancing Tool Wear Prediction Accuracy Using Walsh-Hadamard Transform, DCGAN and Dragonfly Algorithm-Based Feature Selection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viral pneumonia detection during the COVID-19 pandemic using deep learning and DCGAN-based data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detecting statistical interactions in immune receptor data: a comparative study.Journal of applied statistics · 2026Article
- An Advanced Tool Wear Forecasting Technique with Uncertainty Quantification Using Bayesian Inference and Support Vector Regression.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prediction of surface roughness based on fused features and ISSA-DBN in milling of die steel P20.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- On the Stability and Homogeneous Ensemble of Feature Selection for Predictive Maintenance: A Classification Application for Tool Condition Monitoring in Milling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tool wear is an important concern in the manufacturing sector that leads to quality loss, lower productivity, and increased downtime. In recent years, there has been a rise in the popularity of implementing TCM systems using various signal processing methods and machine learning algorithms. In the present paper, the authors propose a TCM system that incorporates the Walsh-Hadamard transform for signal processing, DCGAN aims to circumvent the issue of the availability of limited experimental dataset, and the exploration of three machine learning models: support vector regression, gradient boosting regression, and recurrent neural network for tool wear prediction. The mean absolute error, mean square error and root mean square error are used to assess the prediction errors from three machine learning models. To identify these relevant features, three metaheuristic optimization feature selection algorithms, Dragonfly, Harris hawk, and Genetic algorithms, were explored, and prediction results were compared. The results show that the feature selected through Dragonfly algorithms exhibited the least MSE (0.03), RMSE (0.17), and MAE (0.14) with a recurrent neural network model. By identifying the tool wear patterns and predicting when maintenance is required, the proposed methodology could help manufacturing companies save money on repairs and replacements, as well as reduce overall production costs by minimizing downtime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.