ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Deep Learning-Based Unbalanced Force Identification of the Hypergravity Centrifuge.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and quantitative identification of unbalanced force during operation is of utmost importance to reduce the impact of unbalanced force on a hypergravity centrifuge, guarantee the safe operation of a unit, and improve the accuracy of a hypergravity model test. Therefore, this paper proposes a deep learning-based unbalanced force identification model, then establishes a feature fusion framework incorporating the Residual Network (ResNet) with meaningful handcrafted features in this model, followed by loss function optimization for the imbalanced dataset. Finally, after an artificially added, unbalanced mass was used to build a shaft oscillation dataset based on the ZJU-400 hypergravity centrifuge, we used this dataset to train the unbalanced force identification model. The analysis showed that the proposed identification model performed considerably better than other benchmark models based on accuracy and stability, reducing the mean absolute error (MAE) by 15% to 51% and the root mean square error (RMSE) by 22% to 55% in the test dataset. Simultaneously, the proposed method showed high accuracy and strong stability in continuous identification during the speed-up process, surpassing the current traditional method by 75% in the MAE and by 85% in the median error, which provided guidance for counterweight and guaranteed the unit's stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.