Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112073›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

The Additive Manufacturing Approach to Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Microfluidic Devices: Review and Future Directions.

Anthony Tony, Ildiko Badea, Chun Yang, Yuyi Liu, Garth Wells, Kemin Wang, Ruixue Yin, Hongbo Zhang, Wenjun Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anthony TonyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.
Ildiko BadeaCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-4476
Chun YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-6662
Yuyi LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.
Garth WellsSynchrotron Laboratory for Micro and Nano Devices (SyLMAND), Canadian Light Source, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2V3, Canada.
Kemin WangSchool of Mechatronics and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Ruixue YinSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1326-6145
Hongbo ZhangSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-2323
Wenjun ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7973-8769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature for fabricating PDMS microfluidic devices by employing additive manufacturing (AM) processes. AM processes for PDMS microfluidic devices are first classified into (i) the direct printing approach and (ii) the indirect printing approach. The scope of the review covers both approaches, though the focus is on the printed mold approach, which is a kind of the so-called replica mold approach or soft lithography approach. This approach is, in essence, casting PDMS materials with the mold which is printed. The paper also includes our on-going effort on the printed mold approach. The main contribution of this paper is the identification of knowledge gaps and elaboration of future work toward closing the knowledge gaps in fabrication of PDMS microfluidic devices. The second contribution is the development of a novel classification of AM processes from design thinking. There is also a contribution in clarifying confusion in the literature regarding the soft lithography technique; this classification has provided a consistent ontology in the sub-field of the fabrication of microfluidic devices involving AM processes.

Indexed as

3D printingmicrofabricationmicrofluidicspolydimethylsiloxanepost treatment

Identifiers

PMID37112073
PMCPMC10147032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.