Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112025›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Proposal of Evaluation Method for Crack Propagation Behaviors of Second-Generation Acrylic Adhesives under Mode I Static Loading.

Yuki Ogawa, Kimiyoshi Naito, Keisuke Harada, Hiroyuki Oguma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuki OgawaPolymer Matrix Hybrid Composite Materials Group, Research Center for Structural Materials, National Institute of Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2969-8997
Kimiyoshi NaitoPolymer Matrix Hybrid Composite Materials Group, Research Center for Structural Materials, National Institute of Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3334-4876
Keisuke HaradaPolymer Matrix Hybrid Composite Materials Group, Research Center for Structural Materials, National Institute of Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan.
Hiroyuki OgumaPolymer Matrix Hybrid Composite Materials Group, Research Center for Structural Materials, National Institute of Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second-generation acrylic (SGA) adhesives, possessing high strength and toughness, are applicable in automotive body structures. Few studies have considered the fracture toughness of the SGA adhesives. This study entailed a comparative analysis of the critical separation energy for all three SGA adhesives and an examination of the mechanical properties of the bond. Loading-unloading test was performed to evaluate crack propagation behaviors. In the loading-unloading test of the SGA adhesive with high ductility, plastic deformation was observed in the steel adherends; the arrest load dominated the propagation and non-propagation of crack for adhesive. The critical separation energy of this adhesive was assessed by the arrest load. In contrast, for the SGA adhesives with high tensile strength and modulus, the load suddenly decreased during loading, and the steel adherend was not plastically deformed. The critical separation energies of these adhesives were assessed using the inelastic load. The critical separation energies for all the adhesives were higher for thicker adhesive. Particularly, the critical separation energies of the highly ductile adhesives were more affected by the adhesive thickness than highly strength adhesives. The critical separation energy from the analysis using the cohesive zone model agreed with the experimental results.

Indexed as

acrylic adhesivecohesive zonecrack propagationfracture toughness

Identifiers

PMID37112025
PMCPMC10142537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.