ArticlePolymers2023
Proposal of Evaluation Method for Crack Propagation Behaviors of Second-Generation Acrylic Adhesives under Mode I Static Loading.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Second-generation acrylic (SGA) adhesives, possessing high strength and toughness, are applicable in automotive body structures. Few studies have considered the fracture toughness of the SGA adhesives. This study entailed a comparative analysis of the critical separation energy for all three SGA adhesives and an examination of the mechanical properties of the bond. Loading-unloading test was performed to evaluate crack propagation behaviors. In the loading-unloading test of the SGA adhesive with high ductility, plastic deformation was observed in the steel adherends; the arrest load dominated the propagation and non-propagation of crack for adhesive. The critical separation energy of this adhesive was assessed by the arrest load. In contrast, for the SGA adhesives with high tensile strength and modulus, the load suddenly decreased during loading, and the steel adherend was not plastically deformed. The critical separation energies of these adhesives were assessed using the inelastic load. The critical separation energies for all the adhesives were higher for thicker adhesive. Particularly, the critical separation energies of the highly ductile adhesives were more affected by the adhesive thickness than highly strength adhesives. The critical separation energy from the analysis using the cohesive zone model agreed with the experimental results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.