ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Synthetic Review of Various Dimensions of Non-Destructive Plant Stress Phenotyping.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-throughput screening of heat stress response in Chinese cabbage (Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Post-transcriptional regulation of light-stress responses and predictive modeling in vegetableFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Bridging scales: integrated multi-omics and deep phenotyping for climate resilience in crop plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- DCSFormer: a high-precision method for cotton seedling point cloud organ segmentation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Interactive effects of silicon formulations, concentrations, and foliar application timing on rice physiology and yield.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Editorial: Women in plant science - linking genome to phenome.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Abiotic Stress Phenotyping of Vascular Plant in Each Vegetative Organ View.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Affordable Phenotyping at the Edge for High-Throughput Detection of Hypersensitive Reaction Involving Cotyledon Loss.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Towards the synthesis of spectral imaging and machine learning-based approaches for non-invasive phenotyping of plants.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-destructive plant stress phenotyping begins with traditional one-dimensional (1D) spectroscopy, followed by two-dimensional (2D) imaging, three-dimensional (3D) or even temporal-three-dimensional (T-3D), spectral-three-dimensional (S-3D), and temporal-spectral-three-dimensional (TS-3D) phenotyping, all of which are aimed at observing subtle changes in plants under stress. However, a comprehensive review that covers all these dimensional types of phenotyping, ordered in a spatial arrangement from 1D to 3D, as well as temporal and spectral dimensions, is lacking. In this review, we look back to the development of data-acquiring techniques for various dimensions of plant stress phenotyping (1D spectroscopy, 2D imaging, 3D phenotyping), as well as their corresponding data-analyzing pipelines (mathematical analysis, machine learning, or deep learning), and look forward to the trends and challenges of high-performance multi-dimension (integrated spatial, temporal, and spectral) phenotyping demands. We hope this article can serve as a reference for implementing various dimensions of non-destructive plant stress phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.