Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37111744›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2023

Artificial Intelligence in Drug Metabolism and Excretion Prediction: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

Thi Tuyet Van Tran, Hilal Tayara, Kil To Chong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Automated Annotation of Sites of Metabolism from Biotransformation Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thi Tuyet Van TranDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-0460
Hilal TayaraSchool of International Engineering and Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-3479
Kil To ChongAdvances Electronics and Information Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-0001

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1A2C2005612National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1G1A1004613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug metabolism and excretion play crucial roles in determining the efficacy and safety of drug candidates, and predicting these processes is an essential part of drug discovery and development. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool for predicting drug metabolism and excretion, offering the potential to speed up drug development and improve clinical success rates. This review highlights recent advances in AI-based drug metabolism and excretion prediction, including deep learning and machine learning algorithms. We provide a list of public data sources and free prediction tools for the research community. We also discuss the challenges associated with the development of AI models for drug metabolism and excretion prediction and explore future perspectives in the field. We hope this will be a helpful resource for anyone who is researching in silico drug metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetic properties.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdrug discoverydrug excretiondrug metabolismin silico methodmachine learningweb servers

Identifiers

PMID37111744
PMCPMC10143484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.