ReviewPharmaceutics2023
Solid Phase-Based Microextraction Techniques in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Miniaturised Extraction Techniques in Personalised Medicine: Analytical Opportunities and Translational Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fully Automated Deep Learning Enabled Miniature Mass Spectrometry System for Psychoactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The Preparation of Robust Gully-like Surface of Stainless Steel Fiber-Bonded TFPA-TTA-COF with Nano Pores for Solid-Phase Microextraction of Phenolic Compounds in Water.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Trends in ready-to-use portable electrochemical sensing devices for healthcare diagnosis.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in Toxicology.Toxics · 2024Review
- Opioid Monitoring in Clinical Settings: Strategies and Implications of Tailored Approaches for Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Greenness assessment of microextraction techniques in therapeutic drug monitoring.Bioanalysis · 2024Article
- A practical and easy-to-scale protocol for removing chlorophylls from leaf extracts.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring is an established practice for a small group of drugs, particularly those presenting narrow therapeutic windows, for which there is a direct relationship between concentration and pharmacological effects at the site of action. Drug concentrations in biological fluids are used, in addition to other clinical observation measures, to assess the patient's status, since they are the support for therapy individualization and allow assessing adherence to therapy. Monitoring these drug classes is of great importance, as it minimizes the risk of medical interactions, as well as toxic effects. In addition, the quantification of these drugs through routine toxicological tests and the development of new monitoring methodologies are extremely relevant for public health and for the well-being of the patient, and it has implications in clinical and forensic situations. In this sense, the use of new extraction procedures that employ smaller volumes of sample and organic solvents, therefore considered miniaturized and green techniques, is of great interest in this field. From these, the use of fabric-phase extractions seems appealing. Noteworthy is the fact that SPME, which was the first of these miniaturized approaches to be used in the early '90s, is still the most used solventless procedure, providing solid and sound results. The main goal of this paper is to perform a critical review of sample preparation techniques based on solid-phase microextraction for drug detection in therapeutic monitoring situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.