Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37111446›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Intermediate Cluster Disinfection: Which Disinfection Solution Is Most Effective on Milking Liners? A Comparison of Microorganism Reduction on Liner Inner Surfaces Using Quantitative Swab Sampling Technique.

Sabrina Scheib, Stefanie Leimbach, Georg Avramidis, Martin Bellmann, Julia Nitz, Christian Ochs, Anne Tellen, Nicole Wente, Yanchao Zhang, Wolfgang Viöl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sabrina ScheibDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Mechanical and Bioprocess Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 30452 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2191
Stefanie LeimbachDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Mechanical and Bioprocess Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 30452 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3258-742X
Georg AvramidisFaculty Engineering and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 37085 Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-404X
Martin BellmannFaculty Engineering and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 37085 Goettingen, Germany.
Julia NitzDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Mechanical and Bioprocess Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 30452 Hannover, Germany.
Christian OchsFaculty Engineering and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 37085 Goettingen, Germany.
Anne TellenDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Mechanical and Bioprocess Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 30452 Hannover, Germany.
Nicole WenteDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Mechanical and Bioprocess Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 30452 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7513-9478
Yanchao ZhangDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Mechanical and Bioprocess Engineering, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 30452 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-9326
Wolfgang ViölFaculty Engineering and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 37085 Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-9937
Volker KrömkerDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-2502

Funding

European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) European Innovation Partnership (EIP-AGRI) project "Plasmadip"Steinbeis Research Center Milk Science 4-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During machine milking, pathogenic microorganisms can be transmitted from cow to cow through liners. Therefore, in Germany, a spray method for the intermediate disinfection of the milking cluster is often used for prevention. This method of cluster disinfection is easy to perform, requires little time and no extra materials, and the disinfection solution is safe from outside contamination in the spray bottle. Since no data on a systematic efficacy trial are available, the aim of this study was to determine the microbial reduction effect of intermediate disinfection. Therefore, laboratory and field trials were conducted. In both trials, two sprays of 0.85 mL per burst of different disinfectant solutions were sprayed into the contaminated liners. For sampling, a quantitative swabbing method using a modified wet-dry swab (WDS) technique based on DIN 10113-1: 1997-07 was applied. Thus, the effectiveness of disinfectants based on Peracetic Acid, Hydrogen Peroxide and Plasma-Activated Buffered Solution (PABS) was compared. In the laboratory trial, the inner surfaces of liners were contaminated with pure cultures of

Indexed as

mastitis preventionPeracetic Acid SolutionPlasma-Activated Buffered Solutionsurface microbial countwet–dry swab technique

Identifiers

PMID37111446
PMCPMC10141699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.