ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Fabrication and Characterization of Celecoxib-Loaded Chitosan/Guar Gum-Based Hydrogel Beads.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustained-Release Oral Delivery of NSAIDs and Acetaminophen: Advances and Recent Formulation Strategies-A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Enzymatically Cross-Linked Hydrogel Beads Based on a Novel Poly(aspartamide) Derivative.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to fabricate celecoxib-loaded chitosan/guar gum (CS/GG) single (SC) and dual (DC) crosslinked hydrogel beads using the ionotropic gelation approach. The prepared formulations were evaluated for entrapment efficiency (EE%), loading efficiency (LE%), particle size and swelling studies. The performance efficiency was assessed by in vitro drug release, ex-vivo mucoadhesion, permeability, ex-in vivo swelling and in vivo anti-inflammatory studies. The EE% was found to be ~55% and ~44% for SC5 and DC5 beads, respectively. The LE% was ~11% and ~7% for SC5 and DC5 beads, respectively. The beads showed a matrix-like network with thick fibers. The particle size of beads ranged from ~2.74 to 1.91 mm. About 74% and 24% celecoxib was released from SC and DC hydrogel beads, respectively, within 24 h. The SC formulation showed higher %swelling and permeability than the DC counterpart, while the %mucoadhesion was relatively higher for DC beads. During the in vivo study, a significant decrease in the inflammation of the rat paw and inflammatory markers including C-reactive proteins (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) was observed following treatment with the prepared hydrogel beads; however, the SC formulation showed better therapeutic efficiency. In conclusion, celecoxib-loaded crosslinked CS/GG hydrogel beads can provide sustained drug release and act as potential candidates for managing inflammatory conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.