Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37111183›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Effects of Simulated In Vitro Digestion on the Structural Characteristics, Inhibitory Activity on α-Glucosidase, and Fermentation Behaviours of a Polysaccharide from

Juncheng Chen, Meijuan Lan, Xia Zhang, Wenjuan Jiao, Zhiyi Chen, Lin Li, Bing Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Probiotics and prebiotics in the treatment of functional constipation in the elderly individuals.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Chilean Papaya (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Juncheng ChenInternational School of Public Health and One Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, China.
Meijuan LanSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, Engineering Research Center of Starch and Plant Protein Deep Processing, Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Xia ZhangSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, Engineering Research Center of Starch and Plant Protein Deep Processing, Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Wenjuan JiaoSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou 510610, China.
Zhiyi ChenSericultural & Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Key Laboratory of Functional Foods, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products Processing, Guangzhou 510610, China.
Lin LiFood Chemistry and Technology, College of Oceanology and Food Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China.
Bing LiSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, Engineering Research Center of Starch and Plant Protein Deep Processing, Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
South China University of Technology · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNHainan Medical University · CNQuanzhou Normal University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Sports 2019B110210004National Key R & D Program of China 2016YFD0400303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the simulated saliva-gastrointestinal digestion of AABP-2B on its structural features, inhibitory α-glucosidase activity, and human gut microbiota. The salivary-gastrointestinal digestion results show that there is no significant change in the molecular weight of AABP-2B, and no free monosaccharides are released. This indicates that, under a simulated digestive condition, AABP-2B is not degraded and can be further utilized by gut microbiota. AABP-2B still possessed good inhibitory activity on α-glucosidase after salivary-gastrointestinal digestion, which may be attributed to the largely unchanged structural characteristics of AABP-2B after simulated digestion. Furthermore, in vitro fecal fermentation with AABP-2B after salivary-gastrointestinal digestion showed that AABP-2B modulated the gut microbiota structure and increased the relative proportions of

Indexed as

Anemarrhenaalpha-GlucosidasesDigestionFatty Acids, VolatileFermentationHumansPolysaccharidesalpha-GlucosidasesFatty Acids, VolatilePolysaccharidesAnemarrhena asphodeloides Bungegut microbiotapolysaccharidesalivary–gastrointestinal digestion

Identifiers

PMID37111183
PMCPMC10145594
OpenAlexW4366591013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.