Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37111158›Full record

ReviewNutrients2023

Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis: From the Old Paradigm to the New Evidence.

Sara Sofia De Lucia, Marcello Candelli, Giorgia Polito, Rossella Maresca, Teresa Mezza, Tommaso Schepis, Antonio Pellegrino, Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme, Alberto Nicoletti, Francesco Franceschi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Sofia De LuciaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-3644-8063
Marcello CandelliDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8443-7880
Giorgia PolitoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Rossella MarescaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1472-0039
Teresa MezzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Tommaso SchepisDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonio PellegrinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo Zileri Dal VermeDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alberto NicolettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesco FranceschiDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Enrico Celestino NistaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nutritional management of acute pancreatitis (AP) patients has widely changed over time. The "pancreatic rest" was the cornerstone of the old paradigm, and nutritional support was not even included in AP management. Traditional management of AP was based on intestinal rest, with or without complete parenteral feeding. Recently, evidence-based data underlined the superiority of early oral or enteral feeding with significantly decreased multiple-organ failure, systemic infections, surgery need, and mortality rate. Despite the current recommendations, experts still debate the best route for enteral nutritional support and the best enteral formula. The aim of this work is to collect and analyze evidence over the nutritional aspects of AP management to investigate its impact. Moreover, the role of immunonutrition and probiotics in modulating inflammatory response and gut dysbiosis during AP was extensively studied. However, we have no significant data for their use in clinical practice. This is the first work to move beyond the mere opposition between the old and the new paradigm, including an analysis of several topics still under debate in order to provide a comprehensive overview of nutritional management of AP.

Indexed as

PancreatitisAcute DiseaseEnteral NutritionHumansNutritional SupportPancreasacute pancreatitisimmunonutritionnutritionprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID37111158
PMCPMC10144915
OpenAlexW4366279949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.