Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37111095›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Nutritional Description of Organic and Conventional Food Products in Spain: The BADALI Project.

Ana B Ropero, Fernando Borrás, Marta Rodríguez, Marta Beltrá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana B RoperoInstitute of Bioengineering, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6503-7598
Fernando BorrásDepartment of Statistics, Mathematics and Informatics, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5519-4573
Marta RodríguezPolytechnic School of Orihuela, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain.
Marta BeltráInstitute of Bioengineering, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5242-3924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic food and drink is undoubtedly a growing market. Consumers perceive organic food as healthy, and nutrition claims (NCs) and fortification may add to this perception. Whether this is true is still a matter of controversy, particularly for organic food products. We present here the first comprehensive study of large samples of six specific organic food types, analysing the nutritional quality (nutrient composition and "healthiness") as well as the use of NCs and fortification. In parallel, a comparison with conventional food is also carried out. For this purpose, the Food Database of products in the Spanish market, BADALI, was used. Four cereal-based and two dairy-substitute food types were analysed. Our results show that as many as 81% of organic foods are considered "less healthy" by the Pan American Health Organization Nutrient Profile Model (PAHO-NPM). Organic foods present a slightly improved nutrient profile compared to conventional foods. However, many of the differences, though statistically significant, are nutritionally irrelevant. Organic foods use NCs very frequently, more than conventional foods, with very little micronutrient fortification. The main conclusion of this work is that consumers' perception that organic food products are healthy is unfounded from a nutritional point of view.

Indexed as

Food LabelingNutritional StatusFood, OrganicFood PackagingMicronutrientsNutritive ValueSpainMicronutrientscereal-based productsdairy substitutesfood databasefortificationhealthy foodnutrient compositionnutrient profile/profiling modelnutrition claimsorganicsweeteners

Identifiers

PMID37111095
PMCPMC10144859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.