ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Highly Efficient Workflow for Detecting and Identifying Sequence Variants in Therapeutic Proteins with a High Resolution LC-MS/MS Method.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Active ingredients isolated fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large molecule protein therapeutics have steadily grown and now represent a significant portion of the overall pharmaceutical market. These complex therapies are commonly manufactured using cell culture technology. Sequence variants (SVs) are undesired minor variants that may arise from the cell culture biomanufacturing process that can potentially affect the safety and efficacy of a protein therapeutic. SVs have unintended amino acid substitutions and can come from genetic mutations or translation errors. These SVs can either be detected using genetic screening methods or by mass spectrometry (MS). Recent advances in Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) technology have made genetic testing cheaper, faster, and more convenient compared to time-consuming low-resolution tandem MS and Mascot Error Tolerant Search (ETS)-based workflows which often require ~6 to 8 weeks data turnaround time. However, NGS still cannot detect non-genetic derived SVs while MS analysis can do both. Here, we report a highly efficient Sequence Variant Analysis (SVA) workflow using high-resolution MS and tandem mass spectrometry combined with improved software to greatly reduce the time and resource cost associated with MS SVA workflows. Method development was performed to optimize the high-resolution tandem MS and software score cutoff for both SV identification and quantitation. We discovered that a feature of the Fusion Lumos caused significant relative under-quantitation of low-level peptides and turned it off. A comparison of common Orbitrap platforms showed that similar quantitation values were obtained on a spiked-in sample. With this new workflow, the amount of false positive SVs was decreased by up to 93%, and SVA turnaround time by LC-MS/MS was shortened to 2 weeks, comparable to NGS analysis speed and making LC-MS/MS the top choice for SVA workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.