ReviewMicroorganisms2023
Updates in Laboratory Identification of Invasive Fungal Infection in Neonates.
Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Irrational and Inappropriate Use of Antifungals in the NICU: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Addressing the silent threat: managing invasiveFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Perspectives on the Use of Echinocandins in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis in Neonates.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fungal infection (IFI) in immunocompromised neonates is significantly associated with high morbidity and mortality and has become the third most common infection in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. The early diagnosis of IFI for neonatal patients is difficult because of the lack of specific symptoms. The traditional blood culture remains the gold standard in clinical diagnosis for neonatal patients but it requires a long duration, which delays treatment initiation. Detections of fungal cell-wall components are developed for early diagnosis but the diagnostic accuracy in neonates needs to be improved. PCR-based laboratory methods, such as real-time PCR, droplet digital PCR, and the cationic conjugated polymer fluorescence resonance energy transfer (CCP-FRET) system, distinguish the infected fungal species by their specific nucleic acids and show a high sensitivity and specificity. Particularly, the CCP-FRET system, which contains a cationic conjugated polymer (CCP) fluorescent probe and pathogen-specific DNA labeled with fluorescent dyes, could identify multiple infections simultaneously. In the CCP-FRET system, the CCP and fungal DNA fragments can self-assemble into a complex with an electrostatic interaction and the CCP triggers the FRET effect under ultraviolet light to make the infection visible. Here, we summarize the recent laboratory methods for neonatal IFI identification and provide a new perspective for early clinical fungal diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.