ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Cyclic Voltammetry of Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode Coated with Ag-ZnO Nanoparticles in Chitosan Matrix.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- GSH/pH-Responsive Chitosan-PLA Hybrid Nanosystems for Targeted Ledipasvir Delivery to HepG2 Cells: Controlled Release, Improved Selectivity, DNA Interaction, Electrochemical and Stopped-Flow Kinetics Analyses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advanced Targeted Drug Delivery of Bioactive Agents Fortified with Graft Chitosan in Management of Cancer: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Electrochemical evaluation of screen-printed sensor manufacturing and LOx enzyme immobilization for lactate biomarker detection: influence of reference electrode material.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Effect of Temperature on the Removal of Interferences in the Voltammetric Procedure for the Determination of Cr(VI).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, the authors describe the fabrication of nanocomposite chitosan-based systems of zinc oxide (ZnO), silver (Ag) and Ag-ZnO. Recently, the development of coated screen-printed electrodes using metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) for the specific detection and monitoring of different cancer tumors has been obtaining important results. Ag, ZnO NPs and Ag-ZnO prepared by the hydrolysis of zinc acetate blended with a chitosan (CS) matrix were used for the surface modification of screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) in order to analyze the electrochemical behavior of the typical redox system of a 10 mM potassium ferrocyanide-0.1 M buffer solution (BS). The solutions of CS, ZnO/CS, Ag/CS and Ag-ZnO/CS were prepared in order to modify the carbon electrode surface, and were measured at different scan rates from 0.02 V/s to 0.7 V/s by cyclic voltammetry. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed on a house-built potentiostat (HBP). The cyclic voltammetry of the measured electrodes showed the influence of varying the scan rate. The variation of the scan rate has an influence on the intensity of the anodic and cathodic peak. Both values of currents (anodic and cathodic currents) have higher values for 0.1 V/s (Ia = 22 μA and Ic = -25 μA) compared to the values for 0.06 V/s (Ia = 10 μA and Ic = -14 μA). The CS, ZnO/CS, Ag/CS and Ag-ZnO/CS solutions were characterized using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) with EDX elemental analysis. The modified coated surfaces of screen-printed electrodes were analyzed using optical microscopy (OM). The present coated carbon electrodes showed a different waveform compared to the voltage applied to the working electrode, depending on the scan rate and chemical composition of the modified electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.