Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37110096›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Accelerating the Gas-Solid Interactions for Conductometric Gas Sensors: Impacting Factors and Improvement Strategies.

Hongchao Zhao, Yanjie Wang, Yong Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongchao ZhaoKey Laboratory of Optoelectronic Technology and System of Ministry of Education, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2698-7785
Yanjie WangKey Laboratory of Optoelectronic Technology and System of Ministry of Education, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Yong ZhouKey Laboratory of Optoelectronic Technology and System of Ministry of Education, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2925-3912

Funding

Fundamental and Frontier Research Project of Chongqing Grant No. cstc2019jcyj-884 msxmX0037National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 61704014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal oxide-based conductometric gas sensors (CGS) have showcased a vast application potential in the fields of environmental protection and medical diagnosis due to their unique advantages of high cost-effectiveness, expedient miniaturization, and noninvasive and convenient operation. Of multiple parameters to assess the sensor performance, the reaction speeds, including response and recovery times during the gas-solid interactions, are directly correlated to a timely recognition of the target molecule prior to scheduling the relevant processing solutions and an instant restoration aimed for subsequent repeated exposure tests. In this review, we first take metal oxide semiconductors (MOSs) as the case study and conclude the impact of the semiconducting type as well as the grain size and morphology of MOSs on the reaction speeds of related gas sensors. Second, various improvement strategies, primarily including external stimulus (heat and photons), morphological and structural regulation, element doping, and composite engineering, are successively introduced in detail. Finally, challenges and perspectives are proposed so as to provide the design references for future high-performance CGS featuring swift detection and regeneration.

Indexed as

accelerating the reaction speedscomposites engineeringconductometric gas sensorsexternal activationmetal oxidenanostructure construction

Identifiers

PMID37110096
PMCPMC10146907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.