Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37109947›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?

Tarek Ashi, Raphaël Richert, Davide Mancino, Hamdi Jmal, Sleman Alkhouri, Frédéric Addiego, Naji Kharouf, Youssef Haïkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advanced Materials for Oral Application (Volume 2).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarek AshiDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Raphaël RichertHospices Civils de Lyon, PAM Odontologie, 69100 Lyon, France.
Davide MancinoDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7376-371X
Hamdi JmalICube Laboratory, Mechanics Department, UMR 7357 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-1139
Sleman AlkhouriPrivate Practice, 20097 Hamburg, Germany.
Frédéric AddiegoDepartment Materials Research and Technology (MRT), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), ZAE Robert Steichen, 5 Rue Bommel, L-4940 Hautcharage, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-4081-9526
Naji KharoufDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-138X
Youssef HaïkelDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the mechanical properties of three different calcium-silicate-based cements on the stress distribution of three different retrograde cavity preparations. Biodentine™ "BD", MTA Biorep "BR", and Well-Root™ PT "WR" were used. The compression strengths of ten cylindrical samples of each material were tested. The porosity of each cement was investigated by using micro-computed X-ray tomography. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to simulate three retrograde conical cavity preparations with an apical diameter of 1 mm (Tip I), 1.4 mm (Tip II), and 1.8 mm (Tip III) after an apical 3 mm resection. BR demonstrated the lowest compression strength values (17.6 ± 5.5 MPa) and porosity percentages (0.57 ± 0.14%) compared to BD (80 ± 17 MPa-1.22 ± 0.31%) and WR (90 ± 22 MPa-1.93 ± 0.12%) (

Indexed as

calcium silicate cementcompression strengthretrograde cavitystress distribution

Identifiers

PMID37109947
PMCPMC10145818
OpenAlexW4365509585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.