Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37109530›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Parkinson's Disease and the Cardiac Cycle: A Rapid Literature Review and Case Series.

Holly Bardutz, Jyotpal Singh, Ziaur Rehman, Patrick Bernat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Holly BardutzFaculty of Kinesiology & Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
Jyotpal SinghFaculty of Kinesiology & Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.
Ziaur RehmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK S4P 0W5, Canada.
Patrick BernatFaculty of Kinesiology & Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada.

Funding

External, in-kind donations NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCardiac function in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) is not well understood. We conducted a review of the literature to summarize all available data on the cardiac cycle in patients with PD and followed up the review with a case series to describe the cardiac cycle timing intervals in this patient population.

methodsUsing the search terms ("Cardiac cycle" OR "echocardiography" OR "LVET" OR "IVCT" OR "IVRT" OR "LVEF" OR "Systolic Dysfunction" OR "Diastolic Dysfunction") AND ("Parkinson's Disease"), 514 studies were found with 19 included in the review.

resultsStudies focused on the impact of medication, the presence of autonomic dysfunction, and resting-state, descriptive observational studies which considered the cardiac cycle. While inconsistent, the evidence suggests that patients with PD have some systolic dysfunction, with recent research implying the presence of subclinical systolic dysfunction. From the case series, 13 participants with PD were included and collected cardiac data daily for 6 weeks. Heart rate was consistent on a weekly basis at 67-71 bpm. Mean week-by-week cardiac parameters were also consistent with the systolic time interval at 332-348 ms, isovolumic relaxation time at 92-96 ms, and isovolumic contraction time at 34-36 ms.

conclusionThese timing intervals add valuable normative values for this patient population and the review of the literature suggests that more research is required to better understand cardiac cycle timing intervals in patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Indexed as

cardiac cyclediastolic functionParkinson’s Diseasesystolic function

Identifiers

PMID37109530
PMCPMC10143446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.