Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37109333›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Clinical Relevance of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimally Invasive versus Open Hysterectomy.

Kyung Jin Eoh, Young Joo Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Hye In Jung, Young Tae Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyung Jin EohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1684-2267
Young Joo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ji NamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hye In JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Young Tae KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-1052
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine. n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of vaginal cuff dehiscence following a hysterectomy. Data were prospectively collected from all patients who underwent hysterectomies at a tertiary academic medical center between 2014 and 2018. The incidence and clinical factors of vaginal cuff dehiscence after minimally invasive versus open hysterectomy were compared. Vaginal cuff dehiscence occurred in 1.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7-1.3%) of women who underwent either form of hysterectomy. Among those who underwent open (n = 1458), laparoscopic (n = 3191), and robot-assisted (n = 423) hysterectomies, vaginal cuff dehiscence occurred in 15 (1.0%), 33 (1.0%), and 3 (0.7%) cases, respectively. No significant differences in cuff dehiscence occurrence were identified in patients who underwent various modes of hysterectomies. A multivariate logistic regression model was created using the variables indication for surgery and body mass index. Both variables were identified as independent risk factors for vaginal cuff dehiscence (odds ratio [OR]: 2.74; 95% CI, 1.51-4.98 and OR: 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09-4.41, respectively). The incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence was exceedingly low in patients who underwent various modes of hysterectomies. The risk of cuff dehiscence was predominantly influenced by surgical indications and obesity. Thus, the different modes of hysterectomy do not influence the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence.

Indexed as

complicationdehiscencehysterectomyminimally invasive surgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID37109333
PMCPMC10142584
OpenAlexW4366772275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.