ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
A No-History Multi-Formula Approach to Improve the IOL Power Calculation after Laser Refractive Surgery: Preliminary Results.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Premium Intraocular Lens Implantation After Laser Vision Correction: An Updated Narrative Review of Biometry, IOL Selection, Visual Outcomes, and Clinical Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Use of Natural Products in Myopia Prevention: Recent Applications.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Review
- Intraocular Lens Calculation Concept Based on Aphakic Refraction-Considerations on a Cornea Model With Two Refracting Surfaces.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Repeatability of corneal diameter measured by Sirius versus IOLMaster 700 in myopic eyes: combined with consistency and relationship of sulcus-to-sulcus.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with pterygium: validation of a regression-based keratometric prediction model.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Changes in the effective optical zone following hyperopic keratorefractive lenticule extraction.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Comment on: accuracy of 12 IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Editorial: More than a "formulas problem": IOL power calculation and biometry in the era of "refractive cataract".Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Short-term variability in ocular biometry and the impact of preoperative dry eye.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparing clinical outcomes of trifocal intraocular lens in patients with and without prior history of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Lens Factor Choice in IOL Power Calculation after Laser Refractive Surgery: The Right Constant for Advanced Lens Measurement Approach (ALMA).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A Review of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Based on Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis of Laser in Ophthalmology: From Past to Present.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- The impact of corneal higher-order aberrations on dynamic visual acuity post cataract surgery.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation depending on different keratometry values using a novel network based software platform.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Current Concepts and Recent Updates of Optical Biometry- A Comprehensive Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Comparative Analysis of the Visual, Refractive and Aberrometric Outcome with the Use of 2 Intraocular Refractive Segment Multifocal Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Tropicamide-Phenylephrine Mydriatic Eye Drop Instillation on Choroidal Thickness.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Intraocular Pressure Variations in Postural Changes: Comparison between Obese and Non-Obese Controls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective comparative study proposes a multi-formula approach by comparing no-history IOL power calculation methods after myopic laser-refractive-surgery (LRS). One-hundred-thirty-two eyes of 132 patients who had myopic-LRS and cataract surgery were examined. ALMA, Barrett True-K (TK), Ferrara, Jin, Kim, Latkany and Shammas methods were evaluated in order to back-calculate refractive prediction error (PE). To eliminate any systematic error, constant optimization through zeroing-out the mean error (ME) was performed for each formula. Median absolute error (MedAE) and percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopters (D) of PE were analyzed. PEs were plotted with corresponding mean keratometry (K), axial length (AL), and AL/K ratio; then, different ranges were evaluated. With optimized constants through zeroing-out ME (90 eyes), ALMA was better when K ≤ 38.00 D-AL > 28.00 mm and when 38.00 D < K ≤ 40.00 D-26.50 mm < AL ≤ 29.50 mm; Barrett-TK was better when K ≤ 38.00 D-AL ≤ 26.50 mm and when K > 40.00 D-AL ≤ 28.00 mm or AL > 29.50 mm; and both ALMA and Barrett-TK were better in other ranges. (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.