Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37109167›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Breath Prints for Diagnosing Asthma in Children.

Valentina Sas, Paraschiva Cherecheș-Panța, Diana Borcau, Cristina-Nicoleta Schnell, Edita-Gabriela Ichim, Daniela Iacob, Alina-Petronela Coblișan, Tudor Drugan, Sorin-Claudiu Man

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina SasDepartment of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1405-9519
Paraschiva Cherecheș-PanțaDepartment of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7427-0191
Diana BorcauClinical Hospital for Pediatric Emergencies, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristina-Nicoleta SchnellDepartment of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Edita-Gabriela IchimDepartment of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniela IacobDepartment of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4596-0841
Alina-Petronela CoblișanClinical Hospital for Pediatric Emergencies, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Tudor DruganDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0097-262X
Sorin-Claudiu ManDepartment of Pediatrics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-5014
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy PCD 107/2015Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy PROGRES, 40 PFE/30.12.2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic nose (e-nose) is a new technology applied for the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in breath air. Measuring VOC in exhaled breath can adequately identify airway inflammation, especially in asthma. Its noninvasive character makes e-nose an attractive technology applicable in pediatrics. We hypothesized that an electronic nose could discriminate the breath prints of patients with asthma from controls. A cross-sectional study was conducted and included 35 pediatric patients. Eleven cases and seven controls formed the two training models (models A and B). Another nine cases and eight controls formed the external validation group. Exhaled breath samples were analyzed using Cyranose 320, Smith Detections, Pasadena, CA, USA. The discriminative ability of breath prints was investigated by principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminative analysis (CDA). Cross-validation accuracy (CVA) was calculated. For the external validation step, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Duplicate sampling of exhaled breath was obtained for ten patients. E-nose was able to discriminate between the controls and asthmatic patient group with a CVA of 63.63% and an M-distance of 3.13 for model A and a CVA of 90% and an M-distance of 5.55 for model B in the internal validation step. In the second step of external validation, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 64%, 77% and 50%, respectively, for model A, and 58%, 66% and 50%, respectively, for model B. Between paired breath sample fingerprints, there were no significant differences. An electronic nose can discriminate pediatric patients with asthma from controls, but the accuracy obtained in the external validation was lower than the CVA obtained in the internal validation step.

Indexed as

asthmabreath analysiselectronic nosevolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID37109167
PMCPMC10146639
OpenAlexW4365453792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.