ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
2D Strain Analysis in Myocarditis-Can We Be Any Closer to Diagnose the Acute Phase of the Disease?
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammasomes as Potential Therapeutic Targets to Prevent Chronic Active Viral Myocarditis-Translating Basic Science into Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Manifestations of Patients with Long COVID.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 2D speckle tracking echocardiography and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance in children with acute myocarditis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- The Promising Role of Speckle-tracking Echocardiography in Detecting the Patchy Nature of Myocarditis, Insights from Case Series in the Largest Pediatrics Tertiary Center of UAE.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of present study was to assess left ventricular myocardial deformation detected by 2D STE in patients with suspected acute myocarditis (AM) early on admission in whom later cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation was performed.
methodsA total of 47 patients with suspected AM based on clinical practice were prospectively enrolled. Coronary angiography was performed on all patients to rule out significant coronary artery disease. CMR confirmed myocardial inflammation, oedema, and regional necrosis meeting the Lake Louise criteria in 25 patients (53%, oedema (+) subgroup). In the remaining patients, only LGE was confirmed in the sub-epicardial or intramuscular localization (22 patients, 47%, oedema (-) subgroup). Early on admission, echocardiography with measurements of global and segmental longitudinal strains (GLS), circumferential strains (GCS) at the endocardial (endocardial GCS) and epicardial (epicardial GCS) layers, transmural GCS, and radial strains (RS) were performed.
resultsMild reduction of GLS, GRS, and transmural GCS values were found in patients with oedema (+) subgroup. The epicardial GCS turned out to be the diagnostic factor for oedema with a cut-off point of 13,0% (AUC 0.747,
conclusions2D STE can help to set the diagnosis of AM in patients with acute chest pain with a normal coronary angiogram. The epicardial GCS can serve as a diagnostic factor for oedema in patients with early stage of AM. In patients presenting with signs of AM (oedema in CMR), the epicardial GCS is modified in comparison with a subgroup without oedema; therefore, this parameter could be used to improve the performance of ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.